# Building our own Async-Await using Generators and Promises

# Goal: Async-Await ≈ Generators + Promises

Imagine we are given a piece of code like the one below that uses async functions,

function doTask1(arg) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(arg), 100)
    })
}

function doTask2(arg) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(arg+2), 100)
    })
}

function doTask3(arg) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(arg+3), 100)
    })
}

async function init(arg) {
    const res1 = await doTask1(arg);
    console.log(res1);
    
    const res2 = await doTask2(res1);
    console.log(res2);

    const res3 = await doTask3(res2);
    console.log(res3);

    return res3;
}

init(3);
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

It performs three asynchronous tasks, one after the other where each task depends on the completion of the previous task. Finally, it returns the result of the last task.

Goal

  • How can we rewrite this code using only promises and generator functions?
  • and we don't want ot make a chain of promise.then!
  • How can we reinvent/rebuild our own async and await?

# Remember Generators

Remember:

  • When a generator function is called, its body is not executed right away.
  • Instead it returns an iterator object which adheres to the iterator protocol i.e. it has a next method.
  • The only way to execute the body of the generator is by calling the next method on its iterator-object.
  • Every time the next method is called, its body is executed until the next yield expression.
  • The result of next() is always an object with two properties:
    • value: the yielded value.
    • done: true if the function code has finished, otherwise false
  • This next method also accepts an argument.
  • Calling it with an argument
    • Makes the argumentthe value of the current yield expression and
    • Resumes the execution till the next yield expression

# First Idea: Generators can yield Promises

By now you would be wondering, how do the generator functions help to achieve our goal?

We need to model an asynchronous flow where we have to wait for certain tasks to finish before proceeding ahead. How can we do that?

Well, the most important insight here is that the generator-functions can yield promises too.

  • A generator function can yield a promise (for example an async task), and
  • its iterator can be controlled to halt for this promise to resolve (or reject), and then
  • recursively proceed with the resolved (or rejected) value to ask for the next iteration.

# Rewriting the Async Function as a Generator

This pattern of weaving a an iterator with yielded promises allows us to model our requirement like this:

function doTask1(arg) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(arg), 100)
    })
}

function doTask2(arg) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(arg+2), 100)
    })
}

function doTask3(arg) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(arg+3), 100)
    })
}

function* init(arg) {
    const res1 = yield doTask1(arg);
    console.log(res1);
    
    const res2 = yield doTask2(res1);
    console.log(res2);

    const res3 = yield doTask3(res2);
    console.log(res3);

    return res3;
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Notice how this generator function resembles our async function!

If you change yield for await is the same code!

# Goal

Your goal is to write a function waiter(genFun, arg) that returns a function that when called waiter(genFun, arg)() will iterate on genFun with initial arguments arg but in such a way that it will wait for the fulfillment of the promise yielded on each iteration and that will return the final value. It will be used like this:

function* main() {
    const res = yield waiter(init, 3)();
    console.log(`res=${res}`);
}

waiter(main)();
1
2
3
4
5
6

# First approach: Using .then chains

To run init and make it wait on echa promise we can call it this way:

const gen = init(3);

// no async no await
gen.next().value.then(res1 => 
  gen.next(res1).value.then(res2 => 
    gen.next(res2).value.then(res3 => 
      Promise.resolve(gen.next(res3).value).then(returnValue => 
        console.log(`returnValue ${returnValue}`)
        )
    )
  )
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

The first call to gen.next() yields an object { value: Promise { <pending> }, done: false }. Therefore the expression gen.next().value.then(res1 => ...) assures that the handler res1 => ... will go to the microqueue and be called after the promise returned by doTask1(arg) resolves to 3.

function* init(arg) {
    const res1 = /* Execution pauses here */ yield doTask1(arg); 
    // res1 is 3 after the assignment
    console.log(res1); 
    ...
}
1
2
3
4
5
6

Similarly, the second call to gen.next(res1) yields an object {value: Promise, done: false}. Therefore the sub-expression gen.next(res1).value.then(res2 => ...) assures that the handler res2 => ... will be called when the promise returned by doTask2(res1) resolves.

The third call to gen.next(res2) yields an object {value: Promise, done: false}. Therefore the sub-expression gen.next(res2).value.then(res3 => ...) assures that the handler res3 => ... will be called when the promise returned by doTask3(res2) resolves.

Finally, the expression gen.next(res3) yields an object {value: Promise, done: false}. Therefore the sub-expression

gen.next(res3).value.then(returnValue => console.log(`returnValue ${returnValue}`))
1

ouputs the final value.

The execution of the code produces an output like:

node no-async-await-1.js 
3
5
8
returnValue 8
1
2
3
4
5

Unfortunately, this current solution is not free of .thenchains.

We need something better.

Idea

The problem resembles the series function we wrote in a previous lab where we found a solution making use of recursivity and detecting when all the tasks were done.

# Write the Function Controlling the Execution of the Generator

Now we need a controlled way to execute init.

We need to write a function waiter that can control the iterator of this generator function to "wait for the fulfillment of the promise yielded on each iteration". It has to:

  1. Halt every time a promise is yielded and
  2. Proceeds once the promise resolves (or rejects).

Precise Goal

Write a function waiter(generator, arg) that

/**
 * Builds the generator object for genFun and returns the waiting function
 * @param { generator } genFun - the generator function
 * @param { any } arg     - the argument to pass to the generator function
 * @returns { function }  - a function that executes the generator waiting for each yielded promise
 */
function waiter(genFun, arg) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
  1. creates a generator by calling genFun(arg) and
  2. returns an auxiliary function waitAndrun (Something like we did in the auxiliary callback in the series function of the asyncmap lab)
  3. The returned auxiliary function waitAndRun has to
    • Get the current promise via .next and
    • Wait for that promise to be fulfilled and
    • call recursively itself unless the iterator is exhausted

It will be used like this:

function* main() {
    const res = yield waiter(init, 3)();
    console.log(`res=${res}`);
}

waiter(main)();
1
2
3
4
5
6

So that, when we run it with the generator above, we obtain:

➜  building-async-await-solution git:(main) node solution.js 
3
5
8
res=8
1
2
3
4
5

It sounds complicated, but takes only a few lines to implement.

# See

Grading Rubric#

Comments#

Last Updated: 2 months ago